Sylvester Mauro, S.J. (1619-1687) noted that human intellects can grasp ‘what is, what is not, what can be, and what cannot be’. The first principle, ‘it is not possible that the same thing simultaneously be and not be,' involves them all. The present volume begins with Greeks distinguishing ‘being' from ‘something' and proceeds to the late Scholastic doctrine of ‘supertranscendental being,' which embraces both. On the way is Aristotle's distinction between ‘being as being' and ‘being as true' and his extension of the latter to include impossible objects. The Stoics will see ‘something' as the widest object of human cognition and will affirm that, as signifiable, impossible objects are something, more than mere nonsense. In the sixteenth century, Francisco Suárez will identify mind-dependent beings most of all with impossible objects and will also regard them as signifiable. By this point, two conceptions will stand in opposition. One, adumbrated by Averroes, will explicitly accept the reality and knowability of impossible objects. The other, going back to Alexander of Aphrodisias, will see impossibles as accidental and false conjunctions of possible objects. Seventeenth-century Scholastics will divide on this line, but in one way or another will anticipate the Kantian notion of ‘der Gegenstand überhaupt.' Going farther, Scholastics will see the two-sided upper border of being and knowing at God and the negative theology, and will fix the equally double lower border at ‘supertranscendental being' and ‘supertranscendental nonbeing,' which non-being, remaining intelligible, will negate the actual, the possible, and even the impossible.
Doyle / Salas
ON THE BORDERS OF BEING & KNOW jetzt bestellen!
Weitere Infos & Material
Table of Contents
Chapter 1
Sprouts from Greek Gardens: Antisthenes, Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics
Chapter 2
Suarez on Beings of Reason and Truth
Chapter 3
Extrinsic Cognoscibility
Chapter 4
Impossible Objects
Chapter 5
The Teleology of Impossible Objects
Chapter 6
Beings of Reason and Imagination
Chapter 7
Four Degrees of Abstraction
Chapter 8
From Transcendental to Transcendental
Chapter 9
Supertranscendental Nothing
Chapter 10
Wrestling with a Wraith
Chapter 11
The Borders of Knowability
Chapter 12
Conclusion
Bibliography
Indices
Salas, Victor
Victor M. Salas is an associate professor of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary.
Doyle, John P.
John P. Doyle is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at Saint Louis University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at Kenrick-Glennon Seminary in Shrewsbury, Missouri.
