Poor States, Power and the Politics of IMF Reform

Drivers of Change in the Post- Washington Consensus
1. Auflage 2016
ISBN: 978-1-137-57749-8
Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Buch, Englisch, 185 Seiten, HC runder Rücken kaschiert, Format (B × H): 153 mm x 216 mm, Gewicht: 3695 g

Reihe: International Political Economy Series

This books provides a timely comparative case study that reveals the factors driving the International Monetary Fund's policy reform in Low Income Developing Countries (LIDCs), as a resurgent IMF expands its footprint in the world's poorest states. Through a research design that employs both mainstream and critical IPE theory, Mark Hibben uncovers three major tendencies. Principal-agent analysis, he argues, demonstrates that coalition formation among powerful states, IMF staff and management, and other influential actors is necessary for policy reform. At the same time, he uses constructivist analysis to show that ideational frameworks of what merits appropriate macroeconomic policy response also have an impact on reform efforts, and that IMF management and staff seek legitimacy in their policy choices. In response to the crises in 1999 and 2008, the author maintains, poverty and inequality now 'matter' in IMF thinking and serve as an opportunity for policy insiders and external actors to deepen the institution's new commitment to 'inclusive' growth.  Finally, Hibben draws on neo-Gramscian analysis to highlight how the IMF looked to soften the destabilizing effects of globalization through reforms focused on stakeholder participation in poor states and will continue to do so in its support of the new United Nation Sustainable Development Goals.  This means that the 2015-2030  time period will be a critical juncture for IMF LIDC reform. By drawing from diverse theoretical traditions, the author thus provides a unique framework for the study of contemporary IMF change and how best those interested in LIDC policy reform can meet this objective.

Zielgruppe

Research

Autoren/Hrsg.

Hibben, Mark

Fachgebiete

• Wirtschaftswissenschaften Volkswirtschaftslehre Internationale Wirtschaft Wirtschaftliche Globalisierung
• Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Internationale Beziehungen Entwicklungspolitik, Nord-Süd Beziehungen
• Wirtschaftswissenschaften Volkswirtschaftslehre Internationale Wirtschaft Handelsabkommen, Wirtschaftsorganisationen
• Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Internationale Beziehungen Internationale Organisationen und Institutionen

Inhaltsverzeichnis

1. The IMF, LIDC Reform and the post Washington Consensus
1.1. What drives post Washington Consensus IMF LIDC reform and why does it matter 1.2. Contested areas of IMF LIDC policy in the post 2008 era 1.3 Who are the LIDCs 1.4 Organization, research design, and findings
2. The IMF and LIDCs
2.1 Mandate, quota system, and organizational structure 2.2 Organizational structure 2.3 Lending facilities, FSAPs and the PSI 2.4 Operational culture 2.5 1944-1952: The Bretton Woods framework and the rise of IMF conditionality 2.6 1953-1961: IMF ‘common sense’, the Polak Model, and SBAs 2.7 1962- 1971: Push back, early concessionary lending, and LIDC technical assistance 2.8 1971-1996: Breakdown of Bretton Woods and the Washington Consensus 2.9 Conclusion
3. Theorizing post Washington Consensus LIDC Reform
3.1 What influences IMF policy? 3.2 Theorizing IMF LIDC reform: A rationalist approach 3.3 Theorizing IMF LIDC reform: A constructivist approach 3.4 Theorizing IMF LIDC reform: A historical structural approach 3.5 Conclusion
4. The HIPC and HIPC II Initiatives
4.1 Setting the stage for HIPC and HIPC II: The breakdown of Bretton Woods hegemony 4.2 The Mexican Debt crisis, demand compression, and structural market reform 4.3 From bilateral debt restructuring to debt reduction 4.4 Rethinking IMF LIDC debt forgiveness: the HIPC initiative 4.5 ‘Faster, deeper, and broader debt relief’ with poverty reduction: the HIPC II 4.6 Conclusion
5. ‘Pro-Poor’ Concessionary Lending: The PRGF
5.

Über Autor(innen)

Mark Hibben is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s College of Maine, USA.