Buch, Englisch, 342 Seiten, Format (B × H): 142 mm x 227 mm, Gewicht: 562 g
Justifying the Insanity Defence
Buch, Englisch, 342 Seiten, Format (B × H): 142 mm x 227 mm, Gewicht: 562 g
Reihe: Philosophical Issues in Science
ISBN: 978-0-415-16699-7
Verlag: Taylor & Francis
Lawrie Reznek addresses these questions and more in his controversial investigation of the insanity defense in Evil or Ill? Drawing from countless intriguing case examples, he aims to understand the concept of an excuse, and explains why the law excuses certain actions and not others. In his easily accessible and elegant style, he explains that in law, there exists two excuses derived from Aristotle: the excuses of ignorance and compulsion. Reznek, however proposes a third excuse - the excuse of character change. In introducing this third excuse, Reznek raises a controversial possibility - the abolition of the insanity defence.
Zielgruppe
Postgraduate
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
- Medizin | Veterinärmedizin Medizin | Public Health | Pharmazie | Zahnmedizin Medizinische Fachgebiete Psychiatrie, Sozialpsychiatrie, Suchttherapie
- Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtsethik
- Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtsethik
Weitere Infos & Material
Introduction; Chapter 1 A History of Criminal Responsibility; Chapter 2 A Taxonomy of Defences; Chapter 3 Ignorance as an Excuse; Chapter 4 Compulsion as an Excuse; Chapter 5 Automatism as an Excuse; Chapter 6 The Justification of Excuses; Chapter 7 Causality as an Excuse; Chapter 8 The Reductionist Theory; Chapter 9 Irrationality as an Excuse; Chapter 10 The Concept of Disease; Chapter 11 Character Change as an Excuse; Chapter 12 The Clash of Paradigms; Chapter 13 The Insanity Defence in Practice; Conclusion;