New Interventionist Just War Theory

A Critique
1. Auflage 2021
ISBN: 978-0-367-61528-4
Verlag: Routledge

Buch, Englisch, 254 Seiten, Format (B × H): 161 mm x 240 mm, Gewicht: 549 g

Reihe: Routledge Studies in Intervention and Statebuilding

This book offers a systematic critique of recent interventionist just war theories, which have made the recourse to force easier to justify.

The work argues that these theories, including neo-traditionalist prerogatives to national leaders and a cosmopolitan human rights paradigm, offer criteria for war that are insufficient in principle and dangerous in practice. Drawing on a plurality of moral considerations, the book recommends a modified legalist national defense paradigm, which includes an atrocity threshold for humanitarian intervention and a legitimate authorization requirement. The plausibility of this restrictive framework is applied to case studies, including the long wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, ongoing targeted killing, and possible interventions in Syria and elsewhere. Various arguments which seek to loosen the criteria for war are also systematically analyzed and criticized.

This book will be of much interest to students of just war theory, military history, ethics, political philosophy, and international relations.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Rocheleau, Jordy

Fachgebiete

• Geisteswissenschaften Geschichtswissenschaft Geschichtliche Themen Militärgeschichte
• Geisteswissenschaften Philosophie Ethik, Moralphilosophie
• Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Politische Kultur Menschenrechte, Bürgerrechte
• Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Militärwesen Nationale und Internationale Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik
• Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Internationale Beziehungen Diplomatie
• Interdisziplinäres Wissenschaften Wissenschaften Interdisziplinär Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
• Sozialwissenschaften Politikwissenschaft Internationale Beziehungen Internationale Organisationen und Institutionen

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Introduction Part I: Ethical constraints on recourse to war: jus ad bellum vs realism and neo-traditionalism 1. Just war theory and the ethical restraint of war 2. Presumptions, principles, and prerogatives in war: against hawkish neo-traditionalism 3. Why punishment is not a just cause for war Part II: Defense of a just cause threshold 4. Against the new cosmopolitan interventionism: why human rights protection is not sufficient cause for war 5. What is it good for? Consequences and the limits of war 6. Why two wrongs cannot make a right use of force: A critique of compound just causes Part III: Just war procedures and application 7. Jus ad (continuandum) bellum: reevaluating the justice of interventions over time 8. The nature and necessity of legitimate authorization 9. Conclusion: applying non-interventionist jus ad bellum

Über Autor(innen)

Jordy Rocheleau is Professor of Philosophy at Austin Peay State University, USA. He is co-author of Rights and Wrongs in the College Classroom (2007).