Buch, Englisch, Band 286, 272 Seiten, Format (B × H): 154 mm x 233 mm, Gewicht: 446 g
Pro and Con
Buch, Englisch, Band 286, 272 Seiten, Format (B × H): 154 mm x 233 mm, Gewicht: 446 g
Reihe: Value Inquiry Book Series / Philosophy and Religion
ISBN: 978-90-04-30125-2
Verlag: Brill
Autoren/Hrsg.
Fachgebiete
Weitere Infos & Material
EDITORIAL FOREWORD
KENNETH A. BRYSON
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION: OXFORD'S BONNY APOLOGIST
GREGORY BASSHAM
Part One:
THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIRE
ONE Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis’s Argument from Desire
PETER S. WILLIAMS
TWO Con: Quenching the Argument from Desire
GREGORY BASSHAM
THREE Reply to Gregory Bassham
PETER S. WILLIAMS
FOUR Reply to Peter Williams
GREGORY BASSHAM
Part Two:
THE ARGUMENT FROM REASON
FIVE Pro: The Argument from Reason Defended
VICTOR REPPERT
SIX Con: Naturalism Undefeated
DAVID KYLE JOHNSON
SEVEN Reply to David Kyle Johnson
VICTOR REPPERT
EIGHT Reply to Victor Reppert
DAVID KYLE JOHNSON
Part Three:
THE MORAL ARGUMENT
NINE Pro: The Moral Argument is Convincing
DAVID BAGGETT
TEN Con: A Critique of the Moral Argument
ERIK J. WIELENBERG
ELEVEN: Reply to Erik Wielenberg
DAVID BAGGETT
TWELVE Reply to David Baggett
ERIK J. WIELENBERG
Part Four:
THE TRILEMMA ARGUMENT
THIRTEEN Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis’s “Trilemma”
DONALD S. WILLIAMS
FOURTEEN Con: Lewis’s Trilemma: Case Not Proven
ADAM BARKMAN
FIFTEEN Reply to Adam Barkman
DONALD S. WILLIAMS
SIXTEEN Reply to Donald Williams
ADAM BARKMAN
Part Five:
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL
SEVENTEEN Pro: The Problem of Pain Defended
PHILIP TALLON
EIGHTEEN Con: C. S. Lewis on Evil: At Best a Likely Story
DAVID L. O’HARA
NINETEEN Reply to David L. O’Hara
PHILIP TALLON
TWENTY Reply to Philip Tallon
DAVID L. O’HARA
WORKS CITED
THE CONTRIBUTORS
INDEX