Pleading and Cooperation in Private-Law Litigation

Comparing Germany and the United States
1. Auflage 2024
ISBN: 978-3-428-19263-2
Verlag: Duncker & Humblot

Buch, Englisch, 213 Seiten, Format (B × H): 157 mm x 233 mm, Gewicht: 330 g

Reihe: Studien zum vergleichenden Privatrecht

The book compares inter alia how civil courts in the United States and Germany balance the burdens on the plaintiff and defendant during the pleading and information-disclosure stages by focusing on pleading requirements, accommodations made to the plaintiff to account for information asymmetry and an examination of testimonial privileges. The initial pleading stage of a civil case addresses important threshold questions before the court proceeds to collecting and evaluating evidence. Access to evidence in the United States through discovery procedures is much broader than in Germany and the pleading standard in federal courts was modified due to criticism of costly and invasive discovery. But pleading that requires more than notice to the defendant imposes a higher burden on the plaintiff. The degree to which civil procedure demands cooperation from civil defendants in the form of document and testimonial disclosure likewise reflects broader value judgments about the appropriate burdens on the parties in litigation. Using the ideal types of legal formalism and legal realism, the author examines the jurisprudential underpinnings for differences between German and U.S. approaches to pleading and information-disclosure. The author concludes that important procedural principles and longstanding practices account for significant differences in pleading and cooperation rules; these rules favor defendants in Germany while generally tending to favor plaintiffs in the United States.

Autoren/Hrsg.

Roy, Philippe Matthew

Fachgebiete

• Rechtswissenschaften Ausländisches Recht Common Law (UK, USA, Australien u.a.)
• Rechtswissenschaften Allgemeines Verfahrens-, Zivilprozess- und Insolvenzrecht Zivilprozessrecht
• Rechtswissenschaften Recht, Rechtswissenschaft Allgemein Rechtsvergleichung
• Rechtswissenschaften Bürgerliches Recht

Inhaltsverzeichnis

I. The Significance of Civil Private Law Adjudication
Holmes and the Courts – The American Preference for Judges and Litigation

II. Attacking Formalism
Legal Realism and Related Theories – German Theories of Adjudication – German Legal Science and Methods – Legal Dogmatics and Foundational Research – The Influence of Critical Theories of Adjudication

III. Comparative Method
Why Compare? – What is Comparative Law?

IV. Private-Law Litigation – Values and Attitudes
Comparing the Parties’ Burdens – Civil Pleading Burdens – Shifting the Parties’ Burdens – Conclusion

Über Autor(innen)

Studium der Germanistik und Politikwissenschaft an der Temple University (Philadelphia) sowie an der Universität Hamburg. Studium der Rechtswissenschaften an der Duquesne University School of Law (mit Auszeichnung). Referendariat am regionalen Gerichtshof in Pittsburgh und am Justiziariat des Gouverneurs des Bundestaates Pennsylvania. Research Fellow an der Brooklyn Law School. Rechtsanwalt in New York und Connecticut mit den Schwerpunkten Zivilprozessrecht, Discovery und Steuerrecht des Bundes. Promotion an der Universität zu Köln.

Bachelors of Arts in German and Political Science at Temple University in Philadelphia, including studies at the University of Hamburg. Juris doctor at Duquesne University School of Law (with honors). Legal clerkships at the Governor’s Office of General Counsel of Pennsylvania and the Court of Common Pleas in Pittsburgh. Research fellow at Brooklyn Law School. Practicing attorney in New York and Connecticut in the areas of civil litigation, discovery and tax law. Doctorate of laws degree obtained at the University of Cologne.